You've found the blog of Jason "Naveed" Westby, a philosopher, nerd, and madman...

Sunday, June 28, 2009

What would or could we do?

Conspiracy theories, you either believe in some, don't believe in any, or you label the people nuts who come up with or believe them. They can involve everything from the 9-11 attacks, Nazis, the moon landing, and even aliens in some sort of grand X-files like plot. Then there is also that chance that some of them are real, leaving one big question; what do we do if one turns out to be true?

What got me pondering this you may ask? Well I came upon an interesting article today while browsing through The Daily Grail. It would seem that someone has filed charges against the WHO and UN in response to the swine flu outbreak (Which in and of itself is a bit odd...more below), accusing them of bioterrorism.

Personally I've wondered about the swine flu outbreak myself. First it just spontaneously makes the news in April after purportedly killing many people in Mexico, with various numbers of deaths (mainly do to weak immune systems and secondary infection) reported. Within days it's suddenly all over the world in small pockets (with symptoms being more mild and only a few deaths compared to the possible hundreds mentioned in Mexico), but then reports seem to dwindle down and vanish for a few weeks or so. The media says that it's probably in decline, but will probably resurface in the fall and winter during normal flu season. Then, all of a sudden, the WHO raises the pandemic level to 6, making it an official flu Pandemic, despite the decline, mild symptoms, and a death rate not much higher then the average flu.

Bit odd if you ask me, a bit odd indeed, even more so when you consider that this strain of swine flu known as H1N1 was originally said to be a mix between human, swine, and avian flus which by means has an extremely small chance of happening in nature. And that is where this lawsuit comes in. It proposes that this strain was genetically engineered in a effort by various pharmaceutical companies, the WHO, and the UN. An idea that some including myself pondered back when the swine flu first made the news. Even our Pleiadian friend, Maggador, has similar thoughts on this, although he proposes that the flu itself is a hoax in an effort to sell vaccinations, which may be partly true, but flu being real and just manufactured and put out there for the same reason he suggests.

Either way, in the end it's the vaccinations the lawsuit is concerned over, suggesting that they will do nothing, but spread the flu further, possibly even making the vaccinated more vulnerable to the flu's effects. There is apparently even talks of mandatory vaccinations, which would do nothing more then benefit pharmaceutical companies.

Anyways, this all is purportedly part of a plot that would allow the UN to take over the US, possibly even with the help of our own president. And that's where I come back to my question. What do we do if there is truth in this matter? Would many just brush it off as more nutcases making up conspiracies until it's to late? Or would we see through it, rebelling against the possible grand scheme? And an even more looming question...would those who would seek to prevent the scheme be labeled as quacks, or locked up under manipulated laws? Only the future can tell in my opinion and that is as scary as the possibility that any of this could be true.

0 comments: